Interest in Canada's Student Housing Market Growing Rapidly

Only 16% of undergraduate students live in on-campus housing according to the 2011 Canadian University Survey Consortium (see Table 8). Twice that number live in rental housing off-campus. How would you describe the type of off-campus housing that undergrads live in? After my experience today at the Canadian Student Housing Symposium I can guarantee that a decade from now student housing off-campus will be described in a very different way.


The symposium was hosted by Derek Lobo and his company Rock Apartment Advisors.  In the morning we received insight into the Canadian rental market over the past half century, heard about how to finance student housing and heard from Campus Living Centres (CLC), American Campus Communities (ACC) and Domus Student Housing on management of student housing. The second half had us travel to three ACC properties at the University of Buffalo in Amherst, New York.

Student Housing has been changing over the past decade and in the next decade the change will become bigger and much more noticeable. Hot tubs, large game rooms, indoor basketball courts, model suites available year round to attract new residents, in-unit laundry, a bathroom inside each bedroom and walk-in closets are just some of the features now included. 

About 100 people attended today's symposium with the vast majority looking to or already investing in purpose built student housing properties. The days of student's renting basement apartments is about to become a thing of the past. For-profit student housing providers are learning, adjusting and offering impressive properties for reasonable rates.

How do you feel about these changes to the Canadian student housing market?



Image source

The Animal House teachable moment

Earlier in my career I would hear references made to how living in residence was like the 1978 movie Animal House.These references faded over time until recently when I heard it again. Having never seen the movie I decided it was time I sat down and watched it. Turns out I will never get those two hours back!

Animal House was awful! Aside from being a comedy with little humour and no plot line the story has virtually no resemblance to what it is actually like to live in residence aside from the fact that accommodations were "provided" on a college campus. For instance, residence is not a frat house, alcohol consumption is greatly exaggerated (see social norms study) and accommodations are hardly a dump (see most beautiful residences).

Should you encounter someone who uses Animal House as an analogy for living in residence stop them immediately and counter them with points like these:

• “Powerful learning occurs in situations where people come to know each other as friends”  (Chickering & Reisser, p. 399). -- see Persuasion for more evidence
• Students who live on campus are more likely to persist in higher education
• You can start a company and make millions or billions

What poor analogies have you heard someone make about a student's experience or the supports in place to help students be successful?

Our great-grandchildren's view of our work

In 100 years when our grandchildren and great-grandchildren describe the early 21st century what major factors will they identify as having the greatest influence on our professional world? Looking at our world through that lens will help us strip away many minor factors and day to day influences so we can focus on the big picture which can help with long-term planning.

At the OACUHO conference earlier this summer at McMaster I shared the macro factors I see having the greatest influence on higher education in the coming years and how these factors are influencing the model we have used to deliver housing to students for the past half century. My list of macro factors included the following:

• Government finances & politics, specifically debt and how it is being managed
• Greater influence of groups such as student unions and developers
• Enrollment pattern changes which broadly indicates a leveling off of enrollment nationally

In short, student affairs and higher education can expect to see less money, less students (generally) and more scrutiny. The result will no doubt be that our work will be accomplished in different ways in the future. At the ACUHO-I International Symposium pre-conference workshop earlier this summer one of our colleagues from the University of Edinburgh in Scotland shared with us that one of his residence buildings was initially built in 1680! I'm pretty confident that student affairs as a field had not yet developed 350 years ago.

What macro factors do you think our great-grandchildren will talk about when describing our work?


Image source: http://skillsfor21stcentury.wordpress.com/

Ontario's Education Prime Minister

Two thoughts may come to mind when you read the title for this post. The first is that I made a typo by using the term Prime Minister. The second is that one or both the names Dalton McGuinty or William Davis may come to mind as they have both been described as Ontario's Education Premier. 

If you thought any of the above you would be wrong. Up until William Davis took office as Ontario's 18th Premier in 1971 the title for the leader of Ontario's government was Prime Minister.  Davis changed the title shortly after stepping into the role. William Davis and Dalton McGuinty are significant Premier's when it comes to education in Ontario, but not as significant as John P. Robarts. 

Robarts was a Minister of Education in Ontario and Ontario's Prime Minister from 1961 to 1971 which is a period of time that saw significant change to the educational landscape in Ontario. (Davis was Minister of Education during much of Robart's time as leader)  The entire Ontario College system and several universities were opened during Robart's reign. Brock University, the University of Guelph, Nipissing University and Trent University all started as universities in the 1960's. 

After leaving government Robarts served as Chancellor at both the University of Western Ontario (his alma mater) and York University. The Robarts Library at the University of Toronto is named after him along with the Robarts Research Institute at the University of Western Ontario.

No leader of the Ontario government can match this list of achievements for education in the province. 

For more on Robarts you can read Steve Paiken's Public Triumph, Private Tragedy: The Double Life of John P. Robarts.

The Difference 150 Years Makes

This past weekend I finished reading Pierre Berton's The National Dream which describes the story about building a railway from Montreal to British Columbia in the 1870's. It is hard to fathom a Canada that does not reach from the Atlantic to the Pacific but if the railway was not built that could have been a reality.

My curiosity about early Canada was peaked so I picked up John A: The Man Who Made Us immediately after putting down The National Dream. I am intrigued to see how society has evolved and using that knowledge to better anticipate the future.  Reading about Canada's first Prime Minister provides great insight into the foundation of Canadian society.  For instance, Sir John A. Macdonald started practicing law just before he was 16 years old despite never having studied at university. Practicing law in 19th century Canada did not require a degree.  Obviously, today it is extremely rare for someone to begin working at 16.

In fact, in 21st century Canada, the Ontario government predicts that 70% of jobs will require some form of post-secondary education. Interestingly, the foundation for Canada's education system was set in the 19th century by Egerton Ryerson, the person that my school is named after. (Some controversy now surrounds his approach as he started the Canadian residential school system.)

Another fact about Macdonald's time that seems unreal by today's standards is that a short speech in parliament was two hours long. Macdonald and others were known to give speeches lasting five or six hours. Obviously the 1800's was a time where electronic communications did not exist and Berton explains that politics provided for good theatre so politicians gave lengthy speeches and people listened. Newspapers would often print speeches given in parliament.  Gives whole new meaning to participating in Toastmasters! 

A last noteworthy point for me was the immense effort people had to put into building the actual railroad. It took more than a decade to build and all sorts of physical, personal and political challenges were encountered. An eyeopening and somewhat funny part of the story, especially by today's standards, was that people had to travel a few hundred miles just to pick up the mail - many times through the mountains. Today all we have to do is reach down to our hip and grab our Blackberry or iPhone!